- Improving construction management
- Managing Construction
Stakeholders
- Managing time
- Managing construction risk
- Causes of project failure
- Useful External Web-links &
Resources.
Other related sections of the PMKI:
- The history of
construction management
- Building Information
Modelling (BIM)
- Construction &
Engineering Case Studies
- CIOB Resources
- Dispute management in
construction/engineering
- Claims and Forensic Analysis
- ADR and Dispute Services
- Casewatch Reports – building
& contract law
Construction management has a very long and complex history papers covering some aspects of the last 5000 years can be found in the history section of the PMKI. Papers directly relating to the construction management can be downloaded from: The evolution of construction management. Other related subjects include the development of project controls, and project management.
CIOB Definition of Construction Management:
Construction
Management: Management of the development,
conservation and improvement of the built environment;
exercised at a variety of levels from the site and
project, through the corporate organizations of the
industry and its clients, to society as a whole; embracing
the entire construction value stream from inception to
recycling, and focusing on a commitment to sustainable
construction; incorporating a wide range of specialist
services; guided by a system of values demonstrating
responsibility to humanity and to the future of our
planet; and informed, supported and challenged by an
independent academic discipline.
Rethinking Construction
- Latham report 1994 constructing the team © Crown
Copyright: View
PDF.
- Eagan Report 1998 Rethinking Construction © Crown
Copyright: View PDF
- The benefits and on-going recommendations updated in
Accelerating Change 2002 (Egan & Crane):
View PDF
The Australian government issued a similar report in 2022 with virtually identical conclusions (the only significant difference being a recommendation to use BIM by default - see more on BIM). Download Government Procurement A Sovereign Security Imperative.
Ashurst's Scope for Improvement series of reports
focused on major Australian construction projects with an
average value in excess of $400 million. Issues identified
included inadequate scoping (on average 20% was missed)
and inefficient risk allocation. Almost 50% of the
projects finished late and experienced significant cost
overruns. Unfortunately, nothing much has changed in the
intervening years and the advice and findings in these
reports are still relevant today. Scope for
Improvement reports. These reports identify a series
of major issues in the scoping of manager projects and the
allocation of risk. The trend between 2006 and 2014 was
basically a flat line, with a consistent average of 20% of
scope missed from the project at the time the contracts
were signed.
- 2006
report: Project Pressure Points
- 2008
report: Project Scoping
-
2011 report: Project Risk
- 2014
report: Project pressure points - where industry stands
Blg: Defining Project Scope. If a project’s client cannot ask for what it needs, the project team is highly unlikely to deliver what’s wanted!
Blg: Scope for improvement 4. A summary of the 'scope for improvement' reports.
Blg: Scope for improvement 4 pt2. The management and delivery of mega projects in Australia; focused on the interlinked topics of productivity, innovation and training.
One key way to improve construction delivery is the continuing education the construction and engineering management workforce after graduation. A range of organizations offer qualifications including the CIOB and PMI:
Prs: Rethinking
Construction - Stakeholder Management in the
Construction Industry.
Many technically competent builders are failing to
maximize the value of their work to their client
organizations/employers by focusing exclusively on
technology, data and processes. By including an awareness
of communication and relationship management within the
overall matrix of skills used to develop a schedule, cost
plan, etc, the builder can transform the perception of the
documents value from being seen as an ‘administrative
overhead’ into a valuable resource. To achieve the spread
of effective relationships needed to succeed, the builder,
must recognize that project teams and senior management
have different perceptions, expectations and measures of
success and customize his/her communication strategy to
meet their different requirements. The relationship aware
builder is trusted and relied on by both project teams and
senior management, acting as an effective cultural
translator between the two groups. Technical competence is
still a vital requirement, if this is missing there is no
point in communicating, but once the technical issues are
conquered the difference between average and exceptional
performance is found in the capability of the builder to
effectively relate and communicate with his/her
stakeholders up and down the organization. This paper
outlines a number of techniques and tools, including the Stakeholder
Circle® that can be used to identify and map
stakeholders, understand their requirements and develop an
effective communication plan.
See more on the the Stakeholder
Circle®.
PP: Mega Projects, Mega Problems - The critical need for effective stakeholder management. Effective stakeholder management is mandatory for mega-project success in all advanced economies and in most emerging economies. The ability of people to protest has increased exponentially with the advent of mobile communications and social media. In the 21st century, a single dedicated person can quickly generate a large protest movement. This applies equally to political, environmental and social movements, and mega-projects will inevitably create opposition. The larger the project, the more opponents it is likely to generate, as Spike Milligan is quoted to have said: Money can't buy you friends but you can get a better class of enemy. Traditional construction management has focused on the ‘iron triangle’ of time, cost and scope. Today, this is not enough, ignoring the social aspects of a mega-project will cause the project to fail! If the project is sufficiently controversial, the protest movement can quickly spread globally.
But, effective stakeholder management can contribute to a profitable project outcome. Within the project, stakeholder management encompasses the project team (workers, managers, clients and customers) and the project supply chain. Effective engagement with the ‘supply chain’ has been a focus of reports since the 1994 including Latham and Egan. External to the project stakeholder management encompasses politicians, ‘the public’ and the media as well as people directly or indirectly impacted by the work or its outcomes. Fortunately for both groups of stakeholders, including both the proponents of the project (supporters) and the opponents of the project, the art of stakeholder management remains the same. The key steps are:
Communication within effective relationships is the only ethical way to change stakeholder perceptions and expectations to the benefit of the project. Supporters need to be encouraged, opponents need to be managed and their opposition minimized. The skill is focusing on the right people at the right time. Two tools developed to assist in this process are the Stakeholder Circle® methodology and the SRMM® maturity model. These tools are discussed within the framework of managing mega construction projects to optimize the stakeholder relationships in and around the project and minimize risk exposures.
Prs: Time management -v- Contract administration. Delayed completion affects IT, process plant, oil and gas, building, civil engineering, shipbuilding and marine work contracts. In fact it affects all industries in all countries and the bigger the project, the more damage delayed completion causes to costs, to reputation and sometimes, even to the survival of the contracting parties themselves. Without effective time management there can be no effective resource management, cost management or delay management. Unfortunately, despite the obviousness of this proposition, far too many contracts and contract programs seem designed as highly detailed, ridged mechanisms for measuring failure; rather than using the schedule as a tool for proactively managing time to the benefit of all of the parties to a contract.
Although much has been written about how to apportion liability for delay after a project has gone wrong there was, until recently, no guidance on how to manage time pro-actively and effectively on complex projects. This paper seeks to address this imbalance by focusing on the effective management of time in the 21st Century. This paper defines the standards by which project schedules should be prepared, quality controlled, updated, reviewed and revised in practice to effectively manage time. And then describes the standards of performance which should reasonably be required of a project scheduler. It will contrast the static approach to scheduling defined in most contracts with The Guide’s logical step by step procedures to manage time from inception and risk appraisal, through design and construction to testing and commissioning, to show how an effective and dynamic time model can be used to manage the risk of delay to completion of complex projects. And will demonstrate that as a practical treatise on the processes to be followed and standards to be achieved in effective management of time, The Guide is a scheduling reference document capable of wide application. It can be used in any jurisdiction, under any form of contract, with any type of project and should be identified as the required standard for the preparation and updating of contract programmes, progress reporting and time management.These concepts are built into our schedule training, including our Easy CPM Course-in-a-book.
PP: Balanced Baselines - A Fairer Allocation of Uncertain Risks. The use of a Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) in the construction contract provides the parties to the contract with a mutual understanding of the subsurface site conditions (the baseline). The actual conditions encountered are measured against this baseline. If the contractor comes across a more adverse condition than that of the baseline, then the owner pays the contractor more to complete the work under those adverse conditions, and if the conditions are less adverse than the baseline, then the contractor is paid no more than that tendered. The reduced risk to the contractor should result in lower tender prices and minimizes the opportunity for contract claims and disputes.
Blg: Project or Management Failures? (sources of project failure). The question this blog asks is how many project failures are caused by project management shortcomings and how many failed projects were set up to fail by the organizations management?
Prs: Trust: a tale of two constructions. This blog contrasts Wembley Stadium to the construction of Heathrow Terminal 5 where collaborative contractual arrangements lead to an on time, on budget construction outcome that is unprecedented for a £4 billion airport terminal.
Art: Fairs Fair - Process & Procedural Fairness. When you have to deliver bad news to a person, the processes you use are at least as important as the decision you have made.
See also: Construction Management Case Studies.
The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB). the world's largest and most influential professional body for construction management and leadership: https://www.ciob.org/about
Constructing Excellence - CE (UK) aims to achieve a step change in construction productivity by tackling the market failures and promoting continuous improvement: http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk
IACCM - The International Association for Contract & Commercial Management world-class standards in contracting and relationship management process and skills: https://www.iaccm.com Publishes the IACCM Capability Maturity Model to benchmark contracting processes: https://www.iaccm.com/services/contracting-capability-maturity-assessment/
ICPMA - The International Construction Project Management Association (ICPMA) is an international umbrella association focusing on international Knowledge Management, the General Annual Meeting, working groups and publications: http://www.icpma.net
Major Projects Knowledge Hub (UK). Brings together learning, innovation and good practice from many different sources such as learning legacies by major projects, other related knowledge hubs and websites: https://www.majorprojectsknowledgehub.net
Strategic Forum for Construction (SFfC) UK. SFfC brings together the organisations representing the UK construction sector to work collaboratively for a better industry: http://www.strategicforum.org.uk/